neurokeron.blogg.se

Smbup synology
Smbup synology










smbup synology
  1. #Smbup synology install#
  2. #Smbup synology update#
  3. #Smbup synology mac#
  4. #Smbup synology windows#

However if anything the problem is worse. DSM7 has a much more up-to-date version of Samba (4.10.18) than used to be the case with DSM6.2 (4.4.16 at last count). It's a prosumer product at best.I updated my NAS (a DS418Play, as detailed above) to DSM7.0-41890, hoping that would resolve the issues I have been experiencing with SMB shares from a Macintosh (running Big Sur 11.5).

#Smbup synology update#

Do yourself a favour and "steer" them away from Apple server, its ONLY saving grace appears during software update time, the profile manager is not bad, and maybe the calendar, I don't really have anything too positive to say about it. OSX server is a joke, a very unfunny, frustrating joke.

#Smbup synology install#

It install PROPER SMB onto the macs, albeit version 3.2.

#Smbup synology mac#

You will need to get each mac set up using a simple donationware program called SMBup.

smbup synology

One thing you may (WILL) get plenty of frustration is the latest Apple "upgrade" of the SMB file sharing protocol, it ** as the Yanks would say. The upload speed is out of your control, so Cloud syncing might be painful during the initial setup / sync.

smbup synology

The qNAP has support for mail server, VPN server / client, and almost everything else an SMB needs. Using the qNAP, straight away they get a proper Raid 5 with built in redundancy, you should also look at getting an expansion unit (UX-500P) to keep and active onsite backup, as well as the offsite backup solution. I'm using it for my office setup, having glad-fully retired my Mac Mini & ReadyNAS solution. Thanks for any help and advice.Īny x453 or higher qNAP would provide almost everything you need. I also like the fact the NAS would have hot swap drive bays on the front. Obviously i could get a mac mini os x server, install a file syncing cloud app and do the same thing but the performance of the NAS should in theory outperform the mac mini. This would mean they would be accessing the sync'd files locally rather than accessing a server via the VPN. Then i could use a Synology or QNAP NAS device for file shares, cloud backup but most importantly i could use the cloud file sync app for home workers. I thought we could keep their original mac mini for directory services. Google apps (my usual favorite) is out of the window because there is no google apps sync tool for outlook on the mac, imap is cumbersome and clunky. Originally i was thinking of implementing cloud based email (they have outlook users) so thought of hosted exchange or office 365 rather than the mac mail server. I'm finding it really hard to find much osx server info online, other than it being slated. I am wondering if people can give me advice on their experience with this type of set up. I don't know a great deal about apple servers, however after doing research it looks very easy to set up etc, but also when doing research i find a lot of people online comment on the mail setup being flaky etc.

#Smbup synology windows#

I am trying to come up with a solution for them but i mainly deal with Windows servers and networking for enterprise. They also complain about the speed of their VPN when working from home (which will be due to their limited upload speed). The company has a lot of data stored on the mac mini, are running out of space and complain how slow it is, they also complain that the mail/calendar/contacts services are flaky and problematic. The use the apple sever for file sharing, directory services, mail etc. Hi I have recently been approached by a SMB customer who has a small (11 users) network of OSX based machines with a very old mac mini server (i would expect is a first release).












Smbup synology